<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/07/31/ad_revenue.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/07/31/ad_revenue.html</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, Food, Travel, Poker and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:45:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/07/31/ad_revenue.html/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=193#comment-648</guid>
		<description>How about that - I did get approved to AdSense.  Now I have to figure out if I want to actually implement it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about that &#8211; I did get approved to AdSense.  Now I have to figure out if I want to actually implement it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/07/31/ad_revenue.html/comment-page-1#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=193#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Interesting question Phil.  I think that could work if you offered two feeds - one with ads and one without.  You&#039;ve got to give your readers the ability to &quot;opt-out&quot; (or opt-in depending on your preferences) if they don&#039;t want ads.  What I do like about the idea is that the ads served up could then be tailored specifically to that particular article whereas the AdSense program is for an entire page (maybe even site, I&#039;m not sure how deep it spiders).  Infoworld includes ads occasionally in their feeds and it doesn&#039;t seem to be a big deal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question Phil.  I think that could work if you offered two feeds &#8211; one with ads and one without.  You&#8217;ve got to give your readers the ability to &#8220;opt-out&#8221; (or opt-in depending on your preferences) if they don&#8217;t want ads.  What I do like about the idea is that the ads served up could then be tailored specifically to that particular article whereas the AdSense program is for an entire page (maybe even site, I&#8217;m not sure how deep it spiders).  Infoworld includes ads occasionally in their feeds and it doesn&#8217;t seem to be a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wolff</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/07/31/ad_revenue.html/comment-page-1#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2003 08:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=193#comment-646</guid>
		<description>How would you feel about a service that appends ads to your RSS feeds? Same general model as Google&#039;s but part of your RSS instead of part of your html.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you feel about a service that appends ads to your RSS feeds? Same general model as Google&#8217;s but part of your RSS instead of part of your html.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

