<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Spam Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, Food, Travel, Poker and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:45:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: A New Solution to Comment Spam &#124; John's Jottings</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Solution to Comment Spam &#124; John's Jottings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>[...] September 4th I wrote about the problem in Comment Spam Solutions, adding that I thought the best approach to defeating spam was a blacklist approach where the list [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 4th I wrote about the problem in Comment Spam Solutions, adding that I thought the best approach to defeating spam was a blacklist approach where the list [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solutions for Comment Spam on Blogs &#124; John's Jottings</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>Solutions for Comment Spam on Blogs &#124; John's Jottings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written about before comment spamming is becoming a serious problem. After getting almost a dozen of them today I realized a couple of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written about before comment spamming is becoming a serious problem. After getting almost a dozen of them today I realized a couple of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cero Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Cero Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Hi,
we are testing a new free form-protection service (http://www.cerospam.com.ar), for blogs and for any kind of web site. It is easy to setup each form with this system, and it is very useful for protecting comment forms from spammers.
It is based on captcha method. Until now it seems to work fine. No matter what kind of blog software you are using, this is not a plugin.
Please, test it and do not hesitate to send us your comments!
Thank you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
we are testing a new free form-protection service (<a href="http://www.cerospam.com.ar" rel="nofollow">http://www.cerospam.com.ar</a>), for blogs and for any kind of web site. It is easy to setup each form with this system, and it is very useful for protecting comment forms from spammers.<br />
It is based on captcha method. Until now it seems to work fine. No matter what kind of blog software you are using, this is not a plugin.<br />
Please, test it and do not hesitate to send us your comments!<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chui Tey</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Chui Tey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 03:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-670</guid>
		<description>How about a Java Applet implementation of hashcash to combat comment spam? Obviously,
the people who are using Lynx will be affected, but my guess is this is a small minority.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Java Applet implementation of hashcash to combat comment spam? Obviously,<br />
the people who are using Lynx will be affected, but my guess is this is a small minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paracelsus Rambles</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Paracelsus Rambles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 02:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-674</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comment spam&lt;/strong&gt;

I should have seen this coming: comment spam. A bot posts a meaningless comment to your blog and leaves behind
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comment spam</strong></p>
<p>I should have seen this coming: comment spam. A bot posts a meaningless comment to your blog and leaves behind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paracelsus Rambles</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Paracelsus Rambles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-673</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comment spam&lt;/strong&gt;

I should have seen this coming: comment spam. A bot posts a meaningless comment to your blog and leaves behind
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comment spam</strong></p>
<p>I should have seen this coming: comment spam. A bot posts a meaningless comment to your blog and leaves behind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-669</guid>
		<description>John, tell me what you think about this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jayallen.org/journey/2003/09/killing_comment_spam_dead&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jayallen.org/journey/2003/09/killing_comment_spam_dead&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, tell me what you think about this: <a href="http://www.jayallen.org/journey/2003/09/killing_comment_spam_dead" rel="nofollow">http://www.jayallen.org/journey/2003/09/killing_comment_spam_dead</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainstorms and Raves</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainstorms and Raves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2003 08:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Friday Feast #58: RSS Validator Update, Check Your Sites, Comments Spam&lt;/strong&gt;

Today&#039;s Feast covers ad-blocking software, a new domain for the RSS feed validator, and a fun collection of typography-related photos to browse. Happy weekend, everyone.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friday Feast #58: RSS Validator Update, Check Your Sites, Comments Spam</strong></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s Feast covers ad-blocking software, a new domain for the RSS feed validator, and a fun collection of typography-related photos to browse. Happy weekend, everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2003 05:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-668</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;he&quot; referred to in the sentence &quot;Burningbird says he is using Google against us.&quot; is the spammer, not Shelley.  as in:

&quot;Shelley says that the spammer is using Google against us.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;he&#8221; referred to in the sentence &#8220;Burningbird says he is using Google against us.&#8221; is the spammer, not Shelley.  as in:</p>
<p>&#8220;Shelley says that the spammer is using Google against us.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel D. Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel D. Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Actually it&#039;s Ms. Burningbird. Or Shelly &quot;Burningbird&quot; Powers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it&#8217;s Ms. Burningbird. Or Shelly &#8220;Burningbird&#8221; Powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Two risks already common to real-time blacklists (as used for email today): 1) requires human review of blacklisted entries to prevent abuse, and 2) ofttimes the policies are vague enough that abuse is still possible.

That&#039;s on top of the risk that a blacklist based on IP addresses or address blocks could affect innocent users.  One based on &quot;identity&quot; would be much more effective.

Trust and referall networks act like combined white and black lists.

I created a Pie wiki page to start gathering information on the subject, &lt;a href=&quot;http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/CommentAuthentication&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/CommentAuthentication&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two risks already common to real-time blacklists (as used for email today): 1) requires human review of blacklisted entries to prevent abuse, and 2) ofttimes the policies are vague enough that abuse is still possible.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s on top of the risk that a blacklist based on IP addresses or address blocks could affect innocent users.  One based on &#8220;identity&#8221; would be much more effective.</p>
<p>Trust and referall networks act like combined white and black lists.</p>
<p>I created a Pie wiki page to start gathering information on the subject, <a href="http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/CommentAuthentication" rel="nofollow">http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/CommentAuthentication</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-665</guid>
		<description>except that those are a major accessibility nightmare.  (this just came up yesterday (?) on Mark Pilgrim&#039;s blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/09/02/microsoft-web-services#c003786&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/09/02/microsoft-web-services#c003786&lt;/a&gt; etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except that those are a major accessibility nightmare.  (this just came up yesterday (?) on Mark Pilgrim&#8217;s blog: <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/09/02/microsoft-web-services#c003786" rel="nofollow">http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/09/02/microsoft-web-services#c003786</a> etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2003/09/04/comment_spam_solutions.html/comment-page-1#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=212#comment-664</guid>
		<description>MT needs one of those image to text anti-robot things like vB, paypal and ebay use.
I&#039;m going to head over to MT and suggest it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MT needs one of those image to text anti-robot things like vB, paypal and ebay use.<br />
I&#8217;m going to head over to MT and suggest it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

