Comments on: Obfuscated Perl http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2004/12/24/obfuscated_perl.html Technology, Blogging, Food, Travel, Poker and More Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:45:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: john http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2004/12/24/obfuscated_perl.html/comment-page-1#comment-1027 john Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:39:20 +0000 http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=375#comment-1027 It did indeed work, indeed it is not an oxymoron but a pleonasm, and indeed it uses only Perl keywords but not all of them. It did indeed work, indeed it is not an oxymoron but a pleonasm, and indeed it uses only Perl keywords but not all of them.

]]> By: Joe Grossberg http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2004/12/24/obfuscated_perl.html/comment-page-1#comment-1026 Joe Grossberg Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:29:52 +0000 http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=375#comment-1026 Also, it doesn't use "all the keywords in Perl", just a subset of them (for example, there is no "if"). Also, it doesn’t use “all the keywords in Perl”, just a subset of them (for example, there is no “if”).

]]> By: Joe Grossberg http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2004/12/24/obfuscated_perl.html/comment-page-1#comment-1025 Joe Grossberg Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:03:11 +0000 http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=375#comment-1025 "the Obfuscated Perl Contest, which is, indeed, an oxymoron" I think you mean "redundant". "A cleanly-written Perl script" is the oxymoron. “the Obfuscated Perl Contest, which is, indeed, an oxymoron”

I think you mean “redundant”.

“A cleanly-written Perl script” is the oxymoron.

]]> By: Deane http://www.johnsjottings.com/archives/2004/12/24/obfuscated_perl.html/comment-page-1#comment-1024 Deane Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:11:31 +0000 http://www.johnsjottings.com/wp/?p=375#comment-1024 It seriously worked? I had my doubts. It seriously worked? I had my doubts.

]]>